Prologue
Hi!
I'm writing this due to following consequences, first I don't get time to have this conversation with you. Second I can't ask you for time.
I personally want to tell to you face on face as I could live in the moment.
Another thing I am worried that we may not be in same page. I mean that even if we are speaking about the same thing, we probability perceive the thing in different version (magnitude).
Therefore, I'm going to deal with metaphorically, in a manner which Vishnu Sharma had adopted in Panchatantra.
Further I'm going to use astronomical term because this is our common platform.
Another thing I am worried that we may not be in same page. I mean that even if we are speaking about the same thing, we probability perceive the thing in different version (magnitude).
Therefore, I'm going to deal with metaphorically, in a manner which Vishnu Sharma had adopted in Panchatantra.
Further I'm going to use astronomical term because this is our common platform.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Questioning Sun
You may be aware that in this know universe there are clusters of stars and out of which ~50% are binary in nature. The interesting thing about binary start is they don't revolve around each other but something which is center of their masses. If it get off that center it means that they would wobble and hence known as wobbling stars. Which is fatal for both.
With this goal lets see the genesis of binaries. Let's say Uranus is revolving around the Sun and it wants to become the binary with Sun. It has a mass and so the gravitational force but Sun's is unparalleled. It starts assiduously and makes a revolution, breaking the inertial barrier and sets an invariable orbital velocity.
So far so good, however, looking from atomic perspective, and primordial Bhor's model;
The revolving electron falls to the nucleus. Extrapolating to our system, Uranus is falling towards the center (Sun), the separation between then is closing by. That's how it is divinely planned.
But....
If falling particle (Back to atomic model) is Lennard Jone's particle, there is attractive force till the separation is less than sigma distance. Closer than sigma there is enormous repulsion to such an extend that in Hard sphere model it is termed as infinity. So if the Uranus gets closer than that distance (lets say that sigma is Asteroid belt which separates Jovian planets from terrestrial planets) then will be enormous aberration. Surely at that instant Uranus would be destroyed and Sun would be affected causing instability in entire solar system. That is when Sun is going to do when it is going to burn up all of its fuel and become the red giant, its expansion would envelop the terrestrial planet and Uranus if there would burn out.
With this goal lets see the genesis of binaries. Let's say Uranus is revolving around the Sun and it wants to become the binary with Sun. It has a mass and so the gravitational force but Sun's is unparalleled. It starts assiduously and makes a revolution, breaking the inertial barrier and sets an invariable orbital velocity.
So far so good, however, looking from atomic perspective, and primordial Bhor's model;
The revolving electron falls to the nucleus. Extrapolating to our system, Uranus is falling towards the center (Sun), the separation between then is closing by. That's how it is divinely planned.
But....
If falling particle (Back to atomic model) is Lennard Jone's particle, there is attractive force till the separation is less than sigma distance. Closer than sigma there is enormous repulsion to such an extend that in Hard sphere model it is termed as infinity. So if the Uranus gets closer than that distance (lets say that sigma is Asteroid belt which separates Jovian planets from terrestrial planets) then will be enormous aberration. Surely at that instant Uranus would be destroyed and Sun would be affected causing instability in entire solar system. That is when Sun is going to do when it is going to burn up all of its fuel and become the red giant, its expansion would envelop the terrestrial planet and Uranus if there would burn out.
That Uranus don't want to occur.
Sun may have energy but don't want to exercise until a certain epoch but this uncertainty would be question of birth and cessation for Uranus. If there is no attractive Uranus wants to risk everything to get the warmth of the Sun, even ready revolve with vigor (reduce radius increases the angular velocity) and rotation would be unimaginable (denser planets rotates faster). If there is not interest in terrestrial planets region, then Uranus would be happy to exit the path, would cease everything and leave with great velocity and distance that even matrix of time won't be able decipher the conundrum of this path. It would be a dark body in space with no energy, light or soul, in the venture of death till eternity.
Sun may have energy but don't want to exercise until a certain epoch but this uncertainty would be question of birth and cessation for Uranus. If there is no attractive Uranus wants to risk everything to get the warmth of the Sun, even ready revolve with vigor (reduce radius increases the angular velocity) and rotation would be unimaginable (denser planets rotates faster). If there is not interest in terrestrial planets region, then Uranus would be happy to exit the path, would cease everything and leave with great velocity and distance that even matrix of time won't be able decipher the conundrum of this path. It would be a dark body in space with no energy, light or soul, in the venture of death till eternity.
With a promise that Sun would not even get the glimpse that Uranus ever existed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Epilogue
Forgive my lousy writing, I wanted to convey something.
Please let me know the answer for the asked question.
Please let me know the answer for the asked question.
